Bandit LOAF said:
I don't think there's actually a legitimate breaking down of "flamer types". At least I hope not. If Psych had actually 'overanalysed' the original post, everything would be fine.
I agree, giving an analysis in the first place would have been the civil way to do it.
As for the flamer types... it's more or less a system myself and a couple of buddies worked out, back when we ran a forum...
Type A- Rabid flamer, sometimes takes the intellectual approach, but the result is still the same. Basic insults.
Type B- Picks apart the previous post, this is boredrline debating, but taken to extremes.(overanalyst)
Type C- The Leetspeaking morons. They have even less to say than the type A flamer, and even fewer brain cells to do it with. They do, however, have an ALT key.
Type D- The "Human dictionary," borderline type B, but only picks apart the grammar and spelling of a post.
Type E- Sarcasm.
I've been guilty of B, and D, on occasion. I try to keep general stupidity out of my posts, but sometimes it just creeps in.
edit- threads like this shouldn't be needed in the first place, but sometimes game developers such as the Saga team slip up, and let the updates go for a while.