Quarto said:Well, let's put this into perspective, shall we? The WC3 Arrow has eight missiles, and four guns. It also has better YPR, and it has 16 missile decoys (though in Standoff, this would probably be reduced to 4 - we sorta assume our decoys are more like the WC2/Armada chaff pods than WC3 decoys). Its armour and shields are another matter - it's hard to say how much it would have after reduction from tungsten/plasteel/whatever to durasteel... but it would undoubtedly be a lot more than our Arrow. And 520kps is still not something to laugh at - it would still be the fastest ship in the game apart from the Wraith. All in all, it seems to me the WC3 Arrow would be superior to every other light fighter in the game, and would easily get scores as high as the Wraith (higher, given the Wraith's handicap).
In short - for combat, I can definitely see why Confed would prefer the WC3 variant. Like Chris says, though, Confed has different Arrows for different jobs. The WC3 Arrow doesn't actually replace the Armada Arrow - it just flies different missions.
Sternenwind said:Ah I forgot. at the confederation Run... Broadswords... You really got a Problem in an Arrow against them if you already used your darts^^*
Quarto said:Hehe, yeah. The Arrow is the one and only ship that remains wholly unaffected by the lack of chaff pods
You probably missed the torps . If there are no Confed torp-carrying ships left and the Ralatha is still alive, the Firekka will try to get past her to reach the point. The results of such a duel are usually not too positive for the Firekka .Spertallica said:Hey, out of curiousity, did the patch change anything in the last mission of Ep. 3's losing branch? I just replayed the last mission, and the Firekka seems to be blowing up spontaneously for no reason I can figure out- I didn't see the Ralatha launch torps, and the Gothri are killed before they can do anything- what am I missing?
No chance whatsoever. We didn't roll dice to determine which Arrow to use, we specifically chose the Armada Arrow. Additionally, we're not free to change the stats of ships any time we feel like it - to do so, we'd have to delete all the scores people have earned with the Arrow so far, and it's doubtful that would be too highly appreciated.Iceman16 said:wow. I love the Arrow man, my favorite ship from WC3 and its back (in a variant though). any chance you can make it into the WC3 variant? I toasted a lot of kitties iin my little Arrow.
Quarto said:As far as we know, the two models could have been developed simultaneously. It's not a matter of Confed switching from the Armada Arrow to the WC3 Arrow - the two ships serve different purposes, and could be used at the same time. Additionally, both versions are probably upgrades of earlier versions, because we know that Arrows existed as early as 2654.
Or where all the Arrows just mothballed and couln't reactivated just in time?
Sternenwind said:yeah I know but think about it^^ I think the Kilrathi fighter are much much lower tech than a arrow of the wc3 configuration. Even a very unskilled Pilot is really superior^^
but it is right. What shall you do if there are so many enemys that there is no room to evade an enemy attack^^
I am not sure of it. The WC3 arrow is much faster than evry kilrathisip oof this time.
Sternenwind said:I am not sure of it. The WC3 arrow is much faster than evry kilrathisip oof this time. And its firepower is enough to killl a Fighter very very quick.
Sternenwind said:really on the same line like the others. But there isn't really a use for a Ferret or a Stilletto if you get a wc3 stil Arrow, is there?
I mean. the arrow is faster, better armored, and has more Firepower than the others.
Sternenwind said:Okay perhaps im really a littel bit confused. But i think that even a new baked cadet could attack a hole Kilrathi wing.
"But the cats were driving in too fast. An Arrow flashed past Blair,
blasters firing wildly, but three of the Strakha hit the interceptor with
massed fire. Blair tried to catch up to support the Arrow, but he was too
late. The Terran fighter's shields went down, and in seconds the Kilrathi
blasters chewed through armor and hull, boring into the reactor. The Arrow
went up in a blaze of raw energy."
As LOAF points out, there's a lot of other ships out there that are faster than the WC3 Arrow - the problem with your point of view is that you've completely forgotten about all the Kilrathi ships . You're only comparing the WC3 Arrow with other Confed fighters, and forgetting completely about the ships it's supposed to go up against.Sternenwind said:I am not sure of it. The WC3 arrow is much faster than evry kilrathisip oof this time. And its firepower is enough to killl a Fighter very very quick.
How exactly do you know it's better armoured? The WC3 Arrow is an upgrade of an earlier version of the Arrow. Obviously, the previous version did not use tungsten/plasteel/whatever alloy armour, but instead used the same stuff that WC1/2 ships used. For all we know, the previous version of the WC3 Arrow could have had less armour than the Epee. Or it might have had less guns. Or both - the fact is, we know nothing about the previous versions of the Arrow, except for the fact that they existed. Finally, note that even the WC3 Arrow is much less manoeuvrable than other light fighters (and even the Rapier medium)... though of course, for all we know, the previous version could have been more manoeuvrable.I am only wondering about the ships because I think a wc3 arrow is much superior to an Epee, Rapier, Stilleto, Ferret and even the Morningstar.
Okay the Morning star has more firepower and the Mace + Torpedos so it isn't really on the same line like the others. But there isn't really a use for a Ferret or a Stilletto if you get a wc3 stil Arrow, is there?
I mean. the arrow is faster, better armored, and has more Firepower than the others.