BlackJack2063 said:
Revised them together into a cohesive story and released them as ROBOTECH, with Jack Mckinney writing novelizations (which are quite good).
Saying Jack McKinney (two guys, actually a pen name) wrote good novelizations = instant loss of credibility with me. But I'll forgive you, since you might not know any better. Yet.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a rabid Robotech hater like some people. I actually continue to enjoy the series; some people just take their anime fandom too seriously. However, I find most
fan fiction more enjoyable than McKinney's work; there are just too many jarring or repetitive situations. To be fair, I haven't really figured out a way to make combat sequences sound non-repetitive in writing, which is probably why they work better in a visual medium.
Incidentally, I don't think "warped" as used in Ein-7919's [post=198550]original post[/post] was meant as any sort of value judgement. He may have simply meant that it was changed from the original series it was based on, which it most certainly was. Nothing really wrong with saying that. Oh, sure, warped has a negative connotation, but I think that's reading too much into it, considering he didn't launch into any tirades.
Joshua said:
Just remember all the rules they could have written better but have deliberately refused to do so. They won't listen to good reliable balanced ideas when they're proven they'll work.
Yes, such proven ideas as blackfuel-powered mechs. I remember when George Washington used his blackfuel-powered mechs to charge across the Delaware and surprise the Hessians at Trenton with a barrage of superpolymer glowbug SRMs, thus proving what reliable, balanced ideas such technologies were. He sure proved all the doubters wrong.