Actually, that's probably the wrong way to put it, given that the new bomber would not be filling the same role as the Vindicator.Ijuin said:We will need a bomber, but whether we will see a slightly upgraded Vindicator, or a new bomber, is still up in the air.
The Banshee's seen plenty of upgrades in the decade since WC4 (and probably in the decade or two before it, since we don't actually know how old the Banshee really is), and will not be getting another upgrade... well, ever . The way I see it, the Border Worlds is only planning to upgrade old fighters as long as necessary, so once new fighters go into production, Scims and Banshees will disappear. Museums are probably already lining up to buy up the remaining Scims .However, once the missiles and Stormfire ammo run out, the Banshee becomes useless. It would be better for it to have 2 Laser/2 Ion, and drop the Stormfire cannons instead.
Quarto said:Actually, that's probably the wrong way to put it, given that the new bomber would not be filling the same role as the Vindicator.
I doubt they're quite that prolific, but it's besides the point anyway. The BW forces are still highly irregular. You've got Ferrets and Scims flying in one place, and Bearcats in another. Who knows, there may have even been a whole squadron of Banshees on the Dauntless in the past - but Daniels' squadron had just two. And it just so happens that Banshees will not be among the reinforcements arriving on the Dauntless.BattleDog said:I still think that Vindicators and Banshees are probably prolific like Hellcats and Tigersharks.
Well, as far as an in-universe explanation goes, maybe one of its designers worked on the Rapier II thirty years earlier, I dunno . The real-world answer, though, is that it is the Rapier II - take a look at the SWC version of the Rapier.Iceblade said:P.S. Why soes the Rapier IV look like the Rapier II?
Yeah, I vaguely recall that. I don't know whether Eder's doing anything with it or not. But then again, Eder probably doesn't know either, since we don't currently consider UE2 fighters to be any sort of high priority .KillerWave said:Hmm....i sent the sketch of a fighter to Eder sometime ago wich looked a bit like a wc1/2 style vindicator, the scan quality is bad, but i think it would make an interesting looking bomber..
Quarto said:I doubt they're quite that prolific, but it's besides the point anyway. The BW forces are still highly irregular. You've got Ferrets and Scims flying in one place, and Bearcats in another. Who knows, there may have even been a whole squadron of Banshees on the Dauntless in the past - but Daniels' squadron had just two. And it just so happens that Banshees will not be among the reinforcements arriving on the Dauntless.
Well, you'll certainly still get to fly the Epee and the Scim - in both cases, for the final time; if there is a UE3 (which is a big 'if', given that UE2 isn't even started), neither of those fighters will play a role in it. I don't know what willl be happening with the Kilrathi fighters - the K'ha'haf is too neato to pass up, but the Gratha is a wait-and-see.Ijuin said:In that case, it looks like we will be having mainly all-new fighters for UE2 (counting the Rapier IV as "new" since we don't fly it even in the simulator in UE1). That still leaves open the need for a light fighter and a bomber, though.
We''ll post pics when we're good and ready . I don't want to give anybody the false impression that we're making enough progress to resume regular news updates, because it's kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy thingy - if I start posting screenshots and stuff, I'll want to ensure that there's enough progress to keep such updates coming regularly (news generates progress which generates news, which generates progress... hmm).Preacher said:Man, I'm gettin' tired of all this talk.
How's about y'all start posting some pics, pronto?!...
What makes you think there's a relationship between the Ferret's speed and its fuel consumption, anyway? Why the tiny tank? Have you seen a Ferret lately? There isn't any room for a larger tank . Why would it need more fuel, anyway? It's only flying on afterburners that causes a significant decrease in fuel (normal flight, presumably, is counterbalanced by the fuel scoops). And unless the Ferret gets into combat - which it's not supposed to - it won't be using its afterburners very much.BattleDog said:If you slow the Ferret down its fuel will last longer. I still don't get it though, its a patrol fighter, so why the tiny tank.
I find that unlikely, they have already mentioned in another thread that they are against it. What a pity.just let the Dragon make a cameo...running into an empty one in an asteroid field would be nice.....