Hi t.c.cgi,
Speaking plainly,
Delusion: The lamb was indicted by Roman laws.
Reality: Pilate’s words remained the same: “I find no basis for a charge against him.”
Delusion: Pilate presided at a trial.
Reality: A second trial would invalidate the authority of the High Priests and of the Synedrium before the eyes of the Hebrew people, and would violate the Law that attests "One only Law shall be to him who is born at home, and to the stranger who lives as a foreigner among you”. The fact of asking the lamb five questions doesn’t mean that Pilate held the intention of presiding at a trial. A second trial by the invader’s laws was not what the High Priest asked Pilate to do.
Delusion: The lamb was held prisoner inside the Praetorium.
Reality: The lamb was not Pilate’s prisoner; the Praetorium was the headquarters of a military unit, not a trial Court.
Delusion: The High Priests asked Pilate to nail him on a Roman cross.
Reality: The High Priests’ words remained the same: “We have a Law and he shall die according to our Law.” The word cross does not exist in the books of the Law and of the Psalms and of the Prophets.
Laconic Reunification of scriptures as originally written/ “These are the words which I spoke to you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which are written in the books of the Law and in the books of the Prophets, and in the Psalms concerning me.”
Paraphrase of scriptures at Mark as originally written;
again the high priest asks him, and says to him, Are you the Kodhesh [Holy One] of Ishrael? And Gehav-óshua said, * I AM, and at this immediate moment I can be seen sitting at the right hand of Power, glittering in the clouds of the heaven.
* Gehavéh; ancient Hebrew language; Ge - I, Havéh - Am.
1st Contradiction from the Version of the reality: “..are you the son.. ?” -
[the lamb was not condemned by pronouncing the words “I son of El”, or ‘bar-Yah’ in Hebrew;
Because the Law does not condemn anyone by saying that. Even the statement which belongs from the doctrine of the seventy-one sages of the Hebrew Court has always been that “all the human beings are sons of El”.]
Pilate and the High Priests.
- What accusation do you bring against this man?
- If this man weren’t our prisoner, we wouldn’t have brought him up to you.
- Then why don't you take him yourselves, and judge him according to your law?
- We have been impeded from executing a sentence to death with our own hands.
The reason why the High Priest’s went before Pilate;
The High Priests already had sentenced Him to death, and the only barrier that impeded them from tying His hands together above his head to a post was the presence of the roman army. Judea had been invaded by the Roman empire. Pilate was the representative of the invaders; he was called by the title ‘Pontius’ which means ‘commander’ of the Praetorium;
Only the Romans had the right;
- to appoint and crown the kings.
- to demand unpaid help from the Hebrew population.
- to ask anyone to serve them.
- to impose the death penalty.
- to cause to cease any death penalty.
In that moment, by saying ‘take him yourselves and judge him according to your law’, Pilate didn’t know that their prisoner had already been judged and sentenced to death by the Law of the Hebrew Court at the Sanhedrin.
Now, all that the High Priests were asking for was nothing more than the help of roman soldiers to do what a non-roman could not do: “to tie a sentenced one to a Hebrew green tree”.
2nd Contradiction from the Version of the reality: ‘We want him to be crucified’ -
[The roman cross was the symbol of the roman occupancy and had the form of a roman sword. To the Hebrews and the High Priests the roman cross represented submission and humiliation before the invader, an unclean enemy].
Paraphrase of scriptures as originally written.
- Are you the King of Ishrael?
- ‘*King’ as romans use the word, or, as it is said in Ishrael?
- Am I a Hebrew? For what reason do your own people and the chief priests wish your death? What have you done?
The word ‘*king’ never existed in the ancient Hebrew language, but ‘Anointed’ which means ‘elected from above’, as the Anointed David was, unlike the word king which retains the meaning of ‘appointed from down’.
- My Kingdom is not of this age. If my Kingdom were of this age, then the Hebrews would fight, that I wouldn’t be delivered to the roman soldiers. But now my Kingdom is not from this age.
3rd Contradiction from the ‘Version’ of the reality: “..would fight, that I wouldn’t be delivered to the Hebrews..” -
[The lamb was being delivered to the roman soldiers].
- Are you a king then?
- You would say that I am a king; I have been born to be Anointed of the Truth, and for this reason I have come into the world, that I should testify to the Truth. Everyone who is of the Truth listens to my voice.”
- What Truth?
- I find no basis for a charge against him. But you have a custom, that I should release someone to you at the Passover. Therefore do you want me to release to you the King of Ishrael?
- Not this man, but Barabbas!
[the Hebrew people would want him to release Barabbas, because they knew that the lamb was not Pilate’s prisoner, the commander of the Praetorium [Roman military unit] could not invalidate a Sanhedrin's authority, not even was the lamb sentenced to death according to the roman laws].
- Behold, I bring him out to you, that you may know that I find no basis for a charge against him. Behold, the man!
- Suspend him on a tree! Suspend him on a tree!!
- Do you want me suspend the king of Ishrael? I do authorize you to take him yourselves, and using your own hands nail him on a cross, for I find no basis for a charge against him.”
- We have a Law, and he shall die according to our Law (where there is no cross), because he made himself Gehaveh [I AM] the Holy One of Ishrael.
by Sapphir.
Speaking plainly,
Delusion: The lamb was indicted by Roman laws.
Reality: Pilate’s words remained the same: “I find no basis for a charge against him.”
Delusion: Pilate presided at a trial.
Reality: A second trial would invalidate the authority of the High Priests and of the Synedrium before the eyes of the Hebrew people, and would violate the Law that attests "One only Law shall be to him who is born at home, and to the stranger who lives as a foreigner among you”. The fact of asking the lamb five questions doesn’t mean that Pilate held the intention of presiding at a trial. A second trial by the invader’s laws was not what the High Priest asked Pilate to do.
Delusion: The lamb was held prisoner inside the Praetorium.
Reality: The lamb was not Pilate’s prisoner; the Praetorium was the headquarters of a military unit, not a trial Court.
Delusion: The High Priests asked Pilate to nail him on a Roman cross.
Reality: The High Priests’ words remained the same: “We have a Law and he shall die according to our Law.” The word cross does not exist in the books of the Law and of the Psalms and of the Prophets.
Laconic Reunification of scriptures as originally written/ “These are the words which I spoke to you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which are written in the books of the Law and in the books of the Prophets, and in the Psalms concerning me.”
Paraphrase of scriptures at Mark as originally written;
again the high priest asks him, and says to him, Are you the Kodhesh [Holy One] of Ishrael? And Gehav-óshua said, * I AM, and at this immediate moment I can be seen sitting at the right hand of Power, glittering in the clouds of the heaven.
* Gehavéh; ancient Hebrew language; Ge - I, Havéh - Am.
1st Contradiction from the Version of the reality: “..are you the son.. ?” -
[the lamb was not condemned by pronouncing the words “I son of El”, or ‘bar-Yah’ in Hebrew;
Because the Law does not condemn anyone by saying that. Even the statement which belongs from the doctrine of the seventy-one sages of the Hebrew Court has always been that “all the human beings are sons of El”.]
Pilate and the High Priests.
- What accusation do you bring against this man?
- If this man weren’t our prisoner, we wouldn’t have brought him up to you.
- Then why don't you take him yourselves, and judge him according to your law?
- We have been impeded from executing a sentence to death with our own hands.
The reason why the High Priest’s went before Pilate;
The High Priests already had sentenced Him to death, and the only barrier that impeded them from tying His hands together above his head to a post was the presence of the roman army. Judea had been invaded by the Roman empire. Pilate was the representative of the invaders; he was called by the title ‘Pontius’ which means ‘commander’ of the Praetorium;
Only the Romans had the right;
- to appoint and crown the kings.
- to demand unpaid help from the Hebrew population.
- to ask anyone to serve them.
- to impose the death penalty.
- to cause to cease any death penalty.
In that moment, by saying ‘take him yourselves and judge him according to your law’, Pilate didn’t know that their prisoner had already been judged and sentenced to death by the Law of the Hebrew Court at the Sanhedrin.
Now, all that the High Priests were asking for was nothing more than the help of roman soldiers to do what a non-roman could not do: “to tie a sentenced one to a Hebrew green tree”.
2nd Contradiction from the Version of the reality: ‘We want him to be crucified’ -
[The roman cross was the symbol of the roman occupancy and had the form of a roman sword. To the Hebrews and the High Priests the roman cross represented submission and humiliation before the invader, an unclean enemy].
Paraphrase of scriptures as originally written.
- Are you the King of Ishrael?
- ‘*King’ as romans use the word, or, as it is said in Ishrael?
- Am I a Hebrew? For what reason do your own people and the chief priests wish your death? What have you done?
The word ‘*king’ never existed in the ancient Hebrew language, but ‘Anointed’ which means ‘elected from above’, as the Anointed David was, unlike the word king which retains the meaning of ‘appointed from down’.
- My Kingdom is not of this age. If my Kingdom were of this age, then the Hebrews would fight, that I wouldn’t be delivered to the roman soldiers. But now my Kingdom is not from this age.
3rd Contradiction from the ‘Version’ of the reality: “..would fight, that I wouldn’t be delivered to the Hebrews..” -
[The lamb was being delivered to the roman soldiers].
- Are you a king then?
- You would say that I am a king; I have been born to be Anointed of the Truth, and for this reason I have come into the world, that I should testify to the Truth. Everyone who is of the Truth listens to my voice.”
- What Truth?
- I find no basis for a charge against him. But you have a custom, that I should release someone to you at the Passover. Therefore do you want me to release to you the King of Ishrael?
- Not this man, but Barabbas!
[the Hebrew people would want him to release Barabbas, because they knew that the lamb was not Pilate’s prisoner, the commander of the Praetorium [Roman military unit] could not invalidate a Sanhedrin's authority, not even was the lamb sentenced to death according to the roman laws].
- Behold, I bring him out to you, that you may know that I find no basis for a charge against him. Behold, the man!
- Suspend him on a tree! Suspend him on a tree!!
- Do you want me suspend the king of Ishrael? I do authorize you to take him yourselves, and using your own hands nail him on a cross, for I find no basis for a charge against him.”
- We have a Law, and he shall die according to our Law (where there is no cross), because he made himself Gehaveh [I AM] the Holy One of Ishrael.
by Sapphir.
