Unsurprisingly, Bush leads by a landslide. Personally, I don't think any of the Democratic candidates stand a chance, and I don't agree with them very much either, as is evident. The next highest score was only 57%! Also, I do think Leiberman is the most tolerable of that bunch, which also shows.
Bush: 100% (despite the fact there ARE a few things that he's done lately that I disagree with, but he's doing excellently with the war, and I feel that issue is much more important, or will be in the years to come).
Leiberman: 57% (that's quite a divide. Still, he's the only 'moderate' Democrat. The others go much too far left for my taste).
Edwards: 53%
Kerry: 43% (Mr. 'I was a 'nam veteran who hated fighting the war. All hail me!' While I am thankful for those who fought for the freedom of others and myself, I DO believe there was good cause for that war, and immediately joining a 'Veterans against the war' group after he finished wasn't very impressive to me).
Clark: 42% (has BOTH the Clinton's backing. Bill I could tolerate... but Hilary? Nope).
Dean: 39% (Runs a pseudo-religious campaign, and can't even remember what books are in which parts of the Bible. Sorry Dean, but you're almost TOO energetic, and it's really a turn-off for a presidential candidate. That and I don't agree with you at all). (P.S. Yeeeaaaaaaaaaahh!!!!!!
)
Sharpton: 34% (haven't payed too much attention to this guy).
Kucinich: 27% (ditto)
I guess I'm a bit single minded, eh?