Because, you know, having things on a ship make it *not* battle worthy?
[/qoute]
Why would you put fragile stuff on the outside hull of a battleship? Doesn't sound reasonable...
They obviously are there for a reason
Yes, like having a time limit...
So, you're assuming that they're putting things on the ship to reduce the game's performance?
I don't really understand how you could possible read that from what I've posted.
Sticking in meshes has multiple negative effects on the performance.
Hoever, it's easier and faster to do, which is only valid reason I can think of for that. Well if you can shoot them, it's a gameplay element, which can have an effect on the assets too.
Thats a rather inane defense. If thats the case, then the only ships we would have in science fiction would be X-Wings, Headhunters and Tri-Wings.
You should read it, not everybody. The people doing Scifi movies know this stuff already anyway.
The bad guys being...? This is thirty years after Prophecy. I assume you mean the Nephs?
Not limited to WC. Red seems to be the common color for the bad guys, while the good guys have blue.
That's was a pretty nice element in WCIV though. Like a twist.
Thats about as astute a statement as "I'd stop lying to you if you'd believe me!"
Just trust me on that one.
Yeah, they just let an eight year old blow it up instead.
The droid ship?
It had a round shape, so you could hardly call a sphere out-of-place.
Also it was a part of the basestructure and not a detail.
LeHah, Ninja -- stop. It's pretty apparent now that DaBrain is just responding with the opposite of what everyone else is saying... just let him dig his hole without dragging the rest of us down.
I'm posting what I think, and I'm not basing postings on the opposite of what anybody else said.
Do I
have to like the new style for the ships?
What I really do here, is defending what I said before.