Do you know Quarto, that's the best write up I have seen.
Especially considering that Chris is unknown territory. I think you raised several excellent points. What is expected of Chris as he raised substantially more than his initial expectations? Do people like DS want him to hand it back? bearing in mind some of it is for "ship futures" (as in a ship that people get on release).
If it was anyone else but Chris, I'd be twitching a bit, but his reputation for delivering advanced and complex games is enough for me. I pledged what I felt I could afford, and knew the risk of pledging (that it might not come off). and as C Reid says, on the one hand people bemoan the "string pullers" at big publishing houses for their tables, deadlines and interference with the product, then when Chris pioneers something different, in which he isn't beholden to a layer of management or a strict timeline or even investors expecting a "return", in which he can develop something organically and they're still not happy. The parallels between Valve time and RSI time are there, and yet Valve hardly gets the attention Chris does, perhaps it would have been better to simply say "soon (TM)" like Valve, but even that upsets some of your support base.
Another point I picked up on; DS states that its public money, it isn't; not one Dollar, Pound, Yen or Rouble or anything else of the funding is "Public Money", its all private money! and he refers to investors, what? are we expecting a return or something? I thought I was throwing support behind a Chris Roberts game by paying upfront for a copy of it and a ship or two from the launch day?