I agree this is what Enterprise should have been like from the beginning. But although the plots were a bit weak in the beginning (not as weak as in TNG season 1), the acting was great from the start as opposed to the acting in the first seasons of DS9 & TNG. I really loved s3 though with season long arc.Viper61 said:Enterprise has definitely evolved into a wonderful Star Trek series. Took TNG ~ 3 seasons to finally get things rolling well, but took Enterprise ~ 4. Its really too bad we won't get to see what they could have done with it given a full run.
A lot of people didn't give it a chance because:
- it didn't look like the Star Trek they were used to (no federation yet,...)
- the last ST movie was REALLY crap, they lost a lot of potential viewers there.
And the people at the head of Paramount didn't advertise the series enough & gave it a lousy timeslot (a lot of people weren't even able to watch it until recently, when it was too late)
The sad thing is that Enterprise would have been able to continue & be a lot more succesful on the Sci-fi Channel than on UPN, but, of course, they much rather keep the franchise & bury "Enterprise"
If you 've seen the new Battlestar Galactica, it's not bad, but not nearly as good as Enterprise, but they have a lot more viewers. Why? Because they're on the Sci-fi channel (good advertising, good timeslots)
End of rant ...