vindicator said:
The production of Batman TAS began in 1990-1991
While X-Men was miracled out of the clear blue sky?
vindicator said:
X-Men Really did not set any standards
Nor did Batman, especially. Except for the standards in voice acting. But even then, people Like Jerry Orbach, Adam West and The Harlem Globetrotters were in cartoons long before Paul Dini came onto Fox.
vindicator said:
and in fact, when put up against a batman Episode the script is not as adult or emotion driven as batman was I stated a taste.
And dealing with overtones of bigotry over 70 episodes isn't at all a mature subject matter? Get bent.
vindicator said:
I said that Batman set a standard of quality and substance
A standard? To be followed by...? To set a standard means it was to be followed by items of equal rank - and I think we can both agree that cartoons are just as silly today as they were 10 years ago.
vindicator said:
Real GhostBusters? Jesus, you can't draw a line to that, it was crap.
I'd suggest looking at the writers involved before opening your yap. J.M. DeMatteis, Michael Edens, Steve Perry, Michael Reaves, Linda Woolverton and J. Michael Straczynski were staff writers on the show.
(You keep using your fetid opinions as fact, and I'm just going to end this discussion here. I'm not here to handjob your semantics; I'm here to tell you you're an idiot by my using facts.)
vindicator said:
You do realize that before batman all guns had to be lasers?
So the fact that it had guns makes it "adult"? Thats asinine - I saw Bambi's mother get shot how many years prior?
vindicator said:
You couldn't even show someone dying until this show took on Broadcast Standards and practices.
You do realize how stupid that sounds. If the show "took on" Standards And Practices, it would've lost. The fact of the matter is it
passed the censors. You make it sound like they were some kind of Catholic miracle.
vindicator said:
You obviously don't respect batman and love X-Men so much that you think attacking the show and pointing out it's flaws will make X-Men stack up better
I'm sorry, did I break your wittle heart? I didn't know I had to live up to your standards, Patton. Get serious.
vindicator said:
I don't look at money, since I am a fan and you are not a petty thing such as money doesn't affect me. Since I am a fan, I perfer quality over cheapness. The 40's look of the Batman show pleases me more than the flashy ninties and makes it timeless.
Again, semantics. What you care about doesn't make me care any more or less about it. Your wild nonsense that "since I like Item X, that makes it valid" doesn't hold any water to anyone.
Money is a major factor in animation. Richard Williams holds the world record for film production because of money. It took him 28 years to never finish The Thief And The Cobbler, yet it set an unprecidented standard in animation thats never been matched by any studio before or since. It was the defining influence on Disney's "Aladdin" and was what got him the job to do "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" by Zemeckis and Spielberg.
But you wouldn't know anything about that, would you?
vindicator said:
You blew this way out of it's original context. I simply was encouraging people to buy this DVD set.
If I'm guilty of something, its telling you to go fuck yourself. I don't like people selling me their bullshit and nonsense like they're talking down their noses to me on a subject they only know the thinnest layer about. You can't hack it, man, give it the hell up.