WildWeasel
Spaceman
What does that mean?
No... that will simply mean that the afore-mentioned Ventures are indeed Ventures. I'll see if I can get a screenshot later.If I can find proof that it is an Exeter-class destroyer, then there has to be two different TCS Austins.
Well, I'll be perfectly honest. I happen to like the idea of the Diplomatic Corps naming their ships after UN Secretaries-General, and I happen to consider it highly unlikely for the Diplomatic Corps to get their hands on Exeter-class destroyers... then there's also the simple fact that I like Ventures more than Exeters . It might seem stupid to be arguing about something based on personal preferences, but at the end of the day, all these arguments are based on personal preferences.Originally posted by Bandit LOAF
This entire discussion is idiotic -- the *only* thing that calls the DC ships ventures is the background writing on the wall during the briefings... it's not stated outright in the briefing, they appear as Exeters in the game, and the official guide's in-universe writeup calls them Exeters. I have absolutely no idea what Quarto things he needs to prove.