gevatter Lars
Vice Admiral
For a capital ship designed to bombard planets, you want wide wings - so you can stick as many big lasers and AMGs and what-not in there as possible. It also lets you have more area for engines without significantly increasing the mass of the ship.
Well the wings I meant could maybe carrie turrets, but in this special case they would point into the wrong direction...I meant that one that look like stabelizers of a aerofighter.
I also don't think that the wings I talk about are capable of housing engines without shaking the ship apart or just breaking away with the wings.
That was my post - I'm pretty sure I'm not going to be banned. (I'm also pretty sure I wouldn't ban someone for doing the same thing... but I think Concordia knows I'm not being completely serious. It's entirely situational.)
Well I was not speaking of banning just a little waring...beside that a moderator can't allways be sure if someone meant something serious or not if not mentioned.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'too flat' - based on the windows on the sides, both the Ralari and the Fralthi II are several decks high. With all due respect to our Borg friends, a 'flat' ship is certainly preferrable to a huge brick... you want the smallest RADAR (LIDAR?) cross-section possible.
Well in the case anyone has to life in the Wingpart that I have marked as "to thin" I would rather kill myself but to be trapped inside such a less armored part of the ship...because they can put armor there or personel, but both?
Looking at the clawmarks these wings are just about 1 deck high..not very much space left for armor.