Missile usage

[Dundradal]

And probably more "realistic".

I don't think that it would be realistic for a 1 missile = 1 kill. Shields and armor are there for a reason, not only to take gun damage but also absorb at least 1 missile impact. A dragon dying by 1 missile is not only unrealistic but in "wc reality" if I can use that for a second I feel like a dragon could take probably 2 missiles with moderate damage, but not destruction

 

[Dahan]

I also have a question regarding missiles in WC4. If I remember correctly, imrecs had a penetration value of 450. If this is true, then why do they kill longbows and dragons instantly, which had shields of 500 and armour of 300? Do they bypass the shields, or is it a different reason?

Me thinks that it is a different reason. Me thinks that WC4 was too easy and if defeated the purpose. Althought the game was good and enjoyable, the game should have been redone