Which was my whole point all along. You don't get Nobels for building weapons. We could go into a whole ethics debate here, "should we do research if we know they could leads to new weapons" but I won't.
Dralthi5: And pray tell, why shouldn't he get the Nobel? In 1938, the bomb hasn't been around yet, and he can hardly be held responsible for what others use his inventions for. I mean, I could go and throw my computer at someone (thus turning it into a weapon), but that doesn't mean that the person(s) who invented computers was evil
.
Mad Hatter: Well, I'm not quite sure that it would be enough to just be shot at. For the people, it would. But for the politicians? Hmm... it took twenty years of bloodshed to finally get you out of Lebanon, non?
And remember, there are still all those people who live in the Golan Heights, and don't see the point of giving up the Heights. You know, the ones that are building fortifications just in case the IDF decides to remove them by force
Mad Hatter: Well, I'm not quite sure that it would be enough to just be shot at. For the people, it would. But for the politicians? Hmm... it took twenty years of bloodshed to finally get you out of Lebanon, non?
And remember, there are still all those people who live in the Golan Heights, and don't see the point of giving up the Heights. You know, the ones that are building fortifications just in case the IDF decides to remove them by force
thats cool.........now all we need is space travel,space missles andengines that go really really fast.......and then were all set for an galactic wars to take place
who knows maybe oneday we wont be humans but terrans