I have a question:
If both the
Ranger and
Concordia class carriers are 80 and 40 year old designs (respectively), then why is it that the
Tallahasse and
Savanah class cruisers along with several other classes and types, which have very similar designs to the
Ranger and
Concordia carriers, are featured quite so prominently as they are in WC 3 & 4? I realize that because of the Battle of Terra (ca. 2667 or 2669?), they had to start using older vessels as main line battle vehicles, but you got to wonder, were there really
THAT many perfectly good frigates, destroyers and crusiers in mothballs/reserve status for 20+ years?
And also, why is it that a
Ranger class carrier is almost the exact same length, while only having 35% of the mass and 40% of the fighter compliment, as a
Bengal strike carrier, and at the same time a
Concordia class carrier is only 80 meters longer than a
Ranger class carrier, and yet has 2 and 1/2 times the fighter compliment???
In other words, why does 720m=40F, yet 800m=96F?
And also, although the 40% increase in length from the
Bengal to the
Confederation more or less matches the 20% increase in fighter compliment, why is there also a 9% reduction in mass???
Again, in other words, why does 700m@80kT=100F, yet 963m@73kT=120F?
Lastly, I noticed a slight snaffu with your rendering: Using the JPEG image and using a pixel length comparison (assuming that both ships are level with one another and an isometric view point), I have the
Ranger at 552 pixels in length and the
Concordia at 682 pixels in length. That's a 23% increase in length. Yet according to the ship's statistics that I found in the CIC database, the
Ranger and
Concordia are 720m and 800m in length, respectively. That's only an 11% increase in length. WTF?
If the
Ranger were only 650m in length, which would actually kind of account for the drastic reduction in mass as compared to a
Bengal carrier (especially if you take into consideration that those two little prong thingys at the front end of the ship that don't do a hell of a lot and prolly aren't that massive take up 30-50 meters), then I could completely understand and even applaud the differences.
But it aint.
So, I say again, WTF?
***
Quick Statistical Reference:::
Bengal class Strike Carrier: (Ex:
TCS Tiger's Claw, ca 2644-2655 [WC1])
Mass: 80 kT
Length: 700m
Fighters: 104
Confederation class Dreadnaught: (Ex:
TCS Concordia, ca 2660-2669 [WC2])
Mass: 73 kT
Length: 963m
Fighters: 120
Ranger class Light Carrier: (Ex:
TCS Victory, ca 2584-2669 [WC3])
Mass: 28 kT
Length: 720m (680-700, if you exclude the prong thingys)
Fighters: 40
Concordia class Fleet Carrier: (Ex:
TCS Lexington, ca 2634-2670 [WC4])
https://www.wcnews.com/ships/images/wc4carrierthumb.jpg
Mass: ?
Length: 800m (I'm hoping that excludes the prong thingys, but 730-770 if not)
Fighters: 96