Edx said:Dont Wc3/4 and Prophecy all have bombers with afterburners?
yup, only the Broadsword and Crossbow bombers didnt have afterburners (in the games at least), the rest have them.
Edx said:Dont Wc3/4 and Prophecy all have bombers with afterburners?
Sonntag said:I agree on the Raptor. Strong Shields, deadly guns (neutron plus mass driver is the best combination), ok handling... I never liked the Rapier that much, because I think the guns aren't so good.
Nah, with a fast ship you can get in behind them like nobodys buisness and then hit the match-speed button. Then you just coast along pumping those great and powerful (if not slow) shots up their tail-pipe. (not so great on ships with turrets though usually ships with turrets are slower and fairly easy to hit from the side)
But if the enemy ships flys faster then 400 klicks, you need to wait pretty long on the the enemies tail, and prey he dosn't do evasiv stuff. And what'S the advantage having a fast ship, and then reduce your speed to the enemy ship, to shot it. That's what i meant with nullify(THX to Lt.Death100) speed and handling.
Star Rider said:Ok Quarto, first of all the world is round Columbus proved that in 1492.
Second a single gun Salvo from a Jalkehi is enough to knock out an Epee.
Really ? Strangely particle guns were my favourites in WC2. I can't understand why someone wouldn't like themDelance said:There something wrong with the Particle guns, I never liked them, and it seems a lot of people had the same impression.
Delance said:Almost everyone knew the the world was round by that time. Columbus was not some crazy yahoo, and the spanish crown did not finance a mission that they thought would end up failing.
PopsiclePete said:Really ? Strangely particle guns were my favourites in WC2. I can't understand why someone wouldn't like them
Icefire69 said:Gun configuration on Epee sucks? Centerlined Cannons allow to to concentrate the firepower to one spot (see we lack convergence setting in WC).
The particle cannon, is just that, a Cannon, and it's drawback is energy consumption and refire rate. But it strength is damage, range and speed,
which highly favours an offensive fighter.
Let's see the other choices, the neutron gun, slow, damage is so lala. I don't really like that gun, look at the Hornet in Stand Off , even without convergence problems, this gun is simple worse, and is the " Scim of guns"
The Mass Driver, fast, and packs a punch, but it's projectiles are slow. The enemy got about double the time to evade a shot, then with Lasers or Particles. The mass driver is a gun to kill Heavies with.
The Lasers, fast, good range, but lack the punch. Also has a good refire rate. Two Lasers aren't enough for an attack fighter, but better then the Mass Drivers.
Edx said:Columbus just got lost. I heard he was heading for India.
I don't get it .Delance said:The position of the guns on Epee is just strange. The only ship worst than that, on the main games, is the Bearcat.
I have no idea what you're talking about, the Bearcat was pretty good and the epee was good if you are good at dodging shots. But whats wrong with the epee's gun positions?Delance said:The position of the guns on Epee is just strange. The only ship worst than that, on the main games, is the Bearcat.
Delance said:Well, I didn't like it. And I didn't like the gun configuration on the Bearcat. And the Bearcat had some auto-target thing on the guns (auto-aiming to the ITTS or something) that made it harder to actually hit things. I don't know, I just prefer all the other ships you can fly in those games.
Delance said:Almost everyone knew the the world was round by that time. Columbus was not some crazy yahoo, and the spanish crown did not finance a mission that they thought would end up failing.
Quarto said:I don't get it .