Talk:Jeannette Devereaux: Difference between revisions
Aeronautico (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Lt.Overload (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I see that there is a unwritten section reserved for "alternate history" and the real world in Angel's regard. I don't mean to be critical, but are such sections necessary for these entries? This is just me, but I don't quite know how such a section fits into said articles. Should we keep such sections? If yes, then I won't bring up this issue again. -Aeronautico | I see that there is a unwritten section reserved for "alternate history" and the real world in Angel's regard. I don't mean to be critical, but are such sections necessary for these entries? This is just me, but I don't quite know how such a section fits into said articles. Should we keep such sections? If yes, then I won't bring up this issue again. -Aeronautico | ||
One thing I noticed about this article is that it doesn't say she was mentioned by Blair after he was recaptured in Prophecy. Was it such a minor thing that it doesn't need to be stated or was it just forgotten? | |||
Revision as of 17:06, 24 July 2010
Only one photo should be in the info box. Also, while photo names should be simple and descriptive, try and keep the gallery text in-universe.--AD 02:42, 24 August 2007 (CDT)
I see that there is a unwritten section reserved for "alternate history" and the real world in Angel's regard. I don't mean to be critical, but are such sections necessary for these entries? This is just me, but I don't quite know how such a section fits into said articles. Should we keep such sections? If yes, then I won't bring up this issue again. -Aeronautico
One thing I noticed about this article is that it doesn't say she was mentioned by Blair after he was recaptured in Prophecy. Was it such a minor thing that it doesn't need to be stated or was it just forgotten?
