Talk:Aligned Peoples: Difference between revisions
The Terran Knowledge Bank
(Created page with "My understanding is that the 'aligned' people are races that the Nephilim have subjugated and not the Nephilim themselves. Not sure where I got that from, maybe from the document...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My understanding is that the 'aligned' people are races that the Nephilim have subjugated and not the Nephilim themselves. Not sure where I got that from, maybe from the documents archive? But certainly, the phrase Aligned Peoples was not mentioned in Prophecy or Secret Ops. So I wonder if this is really an appropriate redirect. - Wedge | My understanding is that the 'aligned' people are races that the Nephilim have subjugated and not the Nephilim themselves. Not sure where I got that from, maybe from the documents archive? But certainly, the phrase Aligned Peoples was not mentioned in Prophecy or Secret Ops. So I wonder if this is really an appropriate redirect. - Wedge | ||
: It's from Star★Soldier - and yes, you're right; it's never explicitly stated that the "Aligned People(s)" equate directly to the Nephilim. I realize now I was too hasty on this one; misconceptions like this can be dangerous. Still, it *is* a legitimate term to apply to them, or at least their alliance, in general; I'm not certain how to handle it from here. I did want to get the term in badly. - [[User:Bob McDob|Bob]] 08:25, 31 August 2010 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:25, 31 August 2010
My understanding is that the 'aligned' people are races that the Nephilim have subjugated and not the Nephilim themselves. Not sure where I got that from, maybe from the documents archive? But certainly, the phrase Aligned Peoples was not mentioned in Prophecy or Secret Ops. So I wonder if this is really an appropriate redirect. - Wedge
- It's from Star★Soldier - and yes, you're right; it's never explicitly stated that the "Aligned People(s)" equate directly to the Nephilim. I realize now I was too hasty on this one; misconceptions like this can be dangerous. Still, it *is* a legitimate term to apply to them, or at least their alliance, in general; I'm not certain how to handle it from here. I did want to get the term in badly. - Bob 08:25, 31 August 2010 (CDT)
