Talk:First Battle of Kilrah - 2667: Difference between revisions
Aeronautico (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Maybe it's time that I correct the flaws in this article. I realize it has a lot of reworking that needs to be done. Question: Should we change the title to "Raid of Kilrah" or something? I know this was officially classified as a raid rather than a battle. (Not much of a difference, but regardless, what sounds more appropriate?) -Aeronautico | Maybe it's time that I correct the flaws in this article. I realize it has a lot of reworking that needs to be done. Question: Should we change the title to "Raid of Kilrah" or something? I know this was officially classified as a raid rather than a battle. (Not much of a difference, but regardless, what sounds more appropriate?) -Aeronautico | ||
I reviewed this one already, and only did some basic rephrasing. What sort of direction did you want for the article, it doesn't seem that bad to me? - Wedge | |||
Revision as of 14:13, 21 August 2010
This does need to be totally redone. Writing is poor, facts are wrong and it oversteps its bounds by trying to relate the withdrawal of the Tarawa and Intrepid from Kilrah.
Personally, I'd recommend a rewrite from scratch by someone more familiar with the material.
- Dundradal
Maybe it's time that I correct the flaws in this article. I realize it has a lot of reworking that needs to be done. Question: Should we change the title to "Raid of Kilrah" or something? I know this was officially classified as a raid rather than a battle. (Not much of a difference, but regardless, what sounds more appropriate?) -Aeronautico
I reviewed this one already, and only did some basic rephrasing. What sort of direction did you want for the article, it doesn't seem that bad to me? - Wedge
