Talk:F-103 Excalibur: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Aeronautico (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
- Dund | - Dund | ||
I can go with that. Gonna have to dig that image up, though. Believe me, if I had it, I wouldn't use the current one. That never looked that great to me, either. Oh, and thanks for your additional edits. | |||
-Aeronautico |
Revision as of 01:23, 6 February 2010
This article will need to be rewritten a bit. It's too much a tracing every single thing a Excal ever did. Articles should be informative and perhaps link to other events, but we don't need to retell everything that happens related to a specific something in every article. Instead we can link to say Lancelot Flight or another event. Otherwise articles will get bloated.
- Dundradal
I'd prefer to use the wartime color scheme for the infobox. The current image looks like shit.
- Dund
I updated one Excalibur image, but unless someone has a better version of the main image in 2669 colors, I don't know what to do. Also, I updated the page with the new template. Finally, I cleaned up the summary a bit (Damn, it was bad). If there are any mistakes present, please let me know and I will fix them ASAP. I am not done revising this page.
-Aeronautico
I made a few stylistic changes to the article. I didn't touch any of the text proper though.
- Dund
Sounds good.
Actually, if you want a better main image, Captain Johnny had this awesome render from WC4's development some time ago. We could use that. He provided a bunch of awesome high quality renders a year ago or so. Whatcha think?
-Aeronautico
I'd rather have the original wartime image for the infobox. All other images can be added to the end of the article.
- Dund
I can go with that. Gonna have to dig that image up, though. Believe me, if I had it, I wouldn't use the current one. That never looked that great to me, either. Oh, and thanks for your additional edits.
-Aeronautico