Talk:First Battle of Kilrah - 2667: Difference between revisions
The Terran Knowledge Bank
m (moved Talk:KIlrah Raid - Strike Force Valkyrie - 2667 to Talk:Kilrah Raid - Strike Force Valkyrie - 2667: because I'm an idiot and misspelt it the first time.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Per LOAF and my conversation on #wingnut. We were talking about the name of this inuniverse when we really couldn't find on specific name. We then started talking about a standard for un-named battles. | Per LOAF and my conversation on #wingnut. We were talking about the name of this inuniverse when we really couldn't find on specific name. We then started talking about a standard for un-named battles. That way every mission series in the games don't become "Battle of Tamayo" or "Battle of Torgo" and so on. --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 19:17, 21 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:17, 22 August 2010
Maybe it's time that I correct the flaws in this article. I realize it has a lot of reworking that needs to be done. Question: Should we change the title to "Raid of Kilrah" or something? I know this was officially classified as a raid rather than a battle. (Not much of a difference, but regardless, what sounds more appropriate?) -Aeronautico
- I've been referencing this article as Raid on Kilrah in my edits. I don't know why it's titled like this. The thing in question is repeatedly and often referred to as the "Kilrah raid". - Bob 10:39, 21 August 2010 (CDT)
- I concur. Will move in a few minutes unless anyone objects? - Wedge
- Done. - Wedge
Per LOAF and my conversation on #wingnut. We were talking about the name of this inuniverse when we really couldn't find on specific name. We then started talking about a standard for un-named battles. That way every mission series in the games don't become "Battle of Tamayo" or "Battle of Torgo" and so on. --Dundradal 19:17, 21 August 2010 (CDT)
