User talk:Wedge009: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
And if something of mine sucks, tell me, I know I'm certainly capable of writing a crappy article and want everything in here to be top notch. | And if something of mine sucks, tell me, I know I'm certainly capable of writing a crappy article and want everything in here to be top notch. | ||
- Dund | |||
Not a problem. Any help is better than none at all. | |||
- Dund | - Dund |
Revision as of 17:44, 13 February 2010
Hehe don't worry about it, it was just to point out that I also write garbage too (especially several years ago when I was just trying to get as much info uploaded and not so concerned about quality). When I started that article it is mostly to get the info uploaded so then later I could sort it out. You'll notice there are a bunch of articles like that (See Bondarevsky...the tenses are all wrong and the flow makes me want to be sick), looks like finally we are getting around to fixing them.
If you'd like to start reworking any of those articles, by all means do. At least the old garbage article provides a nice timeline of events for you to incorporate into a new summary :p
And if something of mine sucks, tell me, I know I'm certainly capable of writing a crappy article and want everything in here to be top notch.
- Dund
Not a problem. Any help is better than none at all.
- Dund