User talk:Wedge009: Difference between revisions

The Terran Knowledge Bank
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Hey Wedge,
Hehe don't worry about it, it was just to point out that I also write garbage too (especially several years ago when I was just trying to get as much info uploaded and not so concerned about quality). When I started that article it is mostly to get the info uploaded so then later I could sort it out. You'll notice there are a bunch of articles like that (See Bondarevsky...the tenses are all wrong and the flow makes me want to be sick), looks like finally we are getting around to fixing them.


Nice work on the reviewing. Some of the articles are in dire need of it. If you see an article that you think is better off being rewritten just make a note on its discussion page and I can create a list later of articles we want to redo.
If you'd like to start reworking any of those articles, by all means do. At least the old garbage article provides a nice timeline of events for you to incorporate into a new summary :p


Thanks
And if something of mine sucks, tell me, I know I'm certainly capable of writing a crappy article and want everything in here to be top notch.


- Dundradal
- Dund
 
What's all this about informality? Can you clarify this for me? Maybe then I can amend that issue in some of the articles I've written.
 
-Aeronautico
 
I've written dozens of articles on this site, and quite respectfully, I have tried to make an honest effort to make them sound as professional as possible. I'm not quite sure I recognize the informality you speak of, but I will try to avoid it in future entries (Although how, I'm not sure).
 
-Aeronautico
 
I understand. You want me to lend any assistance to the Tarawa cleanup?
 
-Aeronautico

Revision as of 13:47, 13 February 2010

Hehe don't worry about it, it was just to point out that I also write garbage too (especially several years ago when I was just trying to get as much info uploaded and not so concerned about quality). When I started that article it is mostly to get the info uploaded so then later I could sort it out. You'll notice there are a bunch of articles like that (See Bondarevsky...the tenses are all wrong and the flow makes me want to be sick), looks like finally we are getting around to fixing them.

If you'd like to start reworking any of those articles, by all means do. At least the old garbage article provides a nice timeline of events for you to incorporate into a new summary :p

And if something of mine sucks, tell me, I know I'm certainly capable of writing a crappy article and want everything in here to be top notch.

- Dund

Retrieved from "https://www.wcnews.com/wcpedia/index.php?title=User_talk:Wedge009&oldid=7549"