User talk:Dundradal: Difference between revisions
Aeronautico (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Aeronautico (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
-Aeronautico. | -Aeronautico. | ||
Dundradal, | Hey, Dundradal, in regards to what you said on the TCS Intrepid, you are absolutely right. That was a mistake I made a few months back when I first wrote the article. I got that off the CIC Encyclopedia, which if I remember correctly, identified the Intrepid as a WC3-era destroyer. Naturally, the Southampton came to my mind. But that was before I realized the flaws in the encyclopedia. I apologize for not amending that sooner. | ||
- | |||
-Aeronautico | -Aeronautico |
Revision as of 21:54, 15 July 2009
I'm glad you finally found some multiple perspective shots for some of the starfighters, man. I've been waiting TOO long for these to show up on the CIC!Aeronautico 04:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
My bad on those assumptive statements on some of my new pages, man. I just figured that they were safe and logical assumptions since the entire Enigma Sector was liberated with the fall of K'tithrak Mang, therefore those systems might have been liberated, too. I will refrain from these assumptions on my upcoming entries. Sorry about all that.
-Aeronautico.
Got your message. Will do.
-Aeronautico.
Yo, man. What is the name of the Confed HQ in the Sol System? Does it have an official name? Also, is there any other information available on it?
-Aeronautico.
Hey, Dundradal, in regards to what you said on the TCS Intrepid, you are absolutely right. That was a mistake I made a few months back when I first wrote the article. I got that off the CIC Encyclopedia, which if I remember correctly, identified the Intrepid as a WC3-era destroyer. Naturally, the Southampton came to my mind. But that was before I realized the flaws in the encyclopedia. I apologize for not amending that sooner.
-Aeronautico