Category talk:Border Worlds conflict: Difference between revisions
The Terran Knowledge Bank
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Ok what is going on here? Why is BWC in the military conflicts category (as a page thereby making that category look odd) and then in a BWC category? Article titles should be capitalized. Organizing in this manner actually creates clutter (and confusion...why is there a BWC page and category???) that is avoidable. --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 09:11, 14 August 2010 (CDT) | Ok what is going on here? Why is BWC in the military conflicts category (as a page thereby making that category look odd) and then in a BWC category? Article titles should be capitalized. Organizing in this manner actually creates clutter (and confusion...why is there a BWC page and category???) that is avoidable. --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 09:11, 14 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
I usually try to avoid changing something like this if something is already in place, as was the case here. - Wedge | |||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 14 August 2010
My personal preference is to have capitals in all headings, etc. That aside, is there any particular reason for moving these from Border Worlds Conflict to Border Worlds conflict? - Wedge
- Personal preference, same as you. The ICIS does use 'Border Worlds conflict', as opposed to 'Kilrathi War'.
- Yes, I noticed that. Still, we already had the precedence of existing articles using a capital C, but oh well, what's done is done. - Wedge
Ok what is going on here? Why is BWC in the military conflicts category (as a page thereby making that category look odd) and then in a BWC category? Article titles should be capitalized. Organizing in this manner actually creates clutter (and confusion...why is there a BWC page and category???) that is avoidable. --Dundradal 09:11, 14 August 2010 (CDT)
I usually try to avoid changing something like this if something is already in place, as was the case here. - Wedge
