Talk:WCPedia Rules: Difference between revisions
m (New page: should we go for Wiki formatting (eg internal linking) and categorising(sp?), or will the Future WC Encyclopedia have some other format (and the formatting will become useless)? --~~~~) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I know the rule is "don't steal from Wikipedia, only from yourself"... but what if the two are the same? For instance, I wrote the entry on the Confederation and it's still sitting there six years later, practically unchanged and being voted on to merge with the main article. I think parts of it are better than what we have now - so could I go and rip those parts from my last solo revision? I'm itching for a go at the whole article, actually. | |||
I also wrote an overview on battleships that's since been deleted - gone for over two years now. I don't have the original anymore, but it's still floating around the internet on various Wikipedia copycat sites. I'd like to take it, try and clean it up, bring it up to date. Is that kosher? | |||
<br>[[User:Bob McDob|Bob McDob]] 11:53, 12 August 2010 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
should we go for Wiki formatting (eg internal linking) and categorising(sp?), or will the Future WC Encyclopedia have some other format (and the formatting will become useless)? --[[User:Priest|Priest]] 14:42, 11 August 2007 (CDT) | should we go for Wiki formatting (eg internal linking) and categorising(sp?), or will the Future WC Encyclopedia have some other format (and the formatting will become useless)? --[[User:Priest|Priest]] 14:42, 11 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:53, 12 August 2010
I know the rule is "don't steal from Wikipedia, only from yourself"... but what if the two are the same? For instance, I wrote the entry on the Confederation and it's still sitting there six years later, practically unchanged and being voted on to merge with the main article. I think parts of it are better than what we have now - so could I go and rip those parts from my last solo revision? I'm itching for a go at the whole article, actually.
I also wrote an overview on battleships that's since been deleted - gone for over two years now. I don't have the original anymore, but it's still floating around the internet on various Wikipedia copycat sites. I'd like to take it, try and clean it up, bring it up to date. Is that kosher?
Bob McDob 11:53, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
should we go for Wiki formatting (eg internal linking) and categorising(sp?), or will the Future WC Encyclopedia have some other format (and the formatting will become useless)? --Priest 14:42, 11 August 2007 (CDT)
