Talk:Darket: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
:OK, was just a suggestion =) | :OK, was just a suggestion =) | ||
:Though if we go for this standardized look for each fighter we could probably do something like an infobox I did for [http://p2.wikia.com/wiki/Straith Straith on Tri-Sys-Com] for each variant of a fighter... --[[User:Priest|Priest]] 05:21, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | :Though if we go for this standardized look for each fighter we could probably do something like an infobox I did for [http://p2.wikia.com/wiki/Straith Straith on Tri-Sys-Com] for each variant of a fighter... --[[User:Priest|Priest]] 05:21, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
I'm all for making the tables look better. I don't really know much about that kind of stuff myself. Maybe someone else thinks differently about the pictures but I feel at least that including them in the table is unnecessary. But as long as all the information remains in tact or is improved, by all means experiment with the actual look of the table. --[[User:AD|AD]] 10:19, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:19, 12 August 2007
How about adding pictures to the table, above the names of variants, like I did below, though it doesn't work with this kind of borders very well:
 |
 |
 |
 | |
| A Darket flown off the KIS Sivar's Glory in 2669. | A Darket Dragonfly flown by a mercenary pilot in 2701. | A Darket Raptor flown by a mercenary pilot in 2701. | A Darket Stalker flown by a mercenary pilot in 2701. | |
| Stat\Variant | Darket (2668) | Darket Dragonfly | Darket Raptor | Darket Stalker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length: | 24 meters | 24 meters | 24 meters | 27 meters |
| Mass: | 12 metric tonnes | 12 metric tonnes | 12.5 metric tonnes | 14 metric tonnes |
| Max Velocity: | 520 kps | 580 kps | 515 kps | 425 kps |
| Max Afterburner velocity: | 1250 kps | 1150 kps | 975 kps | 800 kps |
| Acceleration: | 250 k/s^2 | 190 k/s^2 | 190 k/s^2 | 190 k/s^2 |
| Max Y/P/R: | 90/80/90 deg/s | 110/110/110 deg/s | 90/90/90 deg/s | 80/80/80 deg/s |
| Shields: | 80 cm | 80 cm | 130 cm | 80 cm |
| Armor: | 200 cm | 270 cm | 310 cm | 390 cm |
| Guns: | Meson Guns (2) | Laser Cannon (2), Tachyon Gun (2) | Meson Blaster (2), Ionic Pulse Cannon (2) | Laser Cannon (2), Neutron Gun (2) |
| Missile Hardpoints: | 1x2 (2HS) | 2x20 (40DF), 1x5 (5HS) | 2x20 (40DF), 2x5 (10HS) | 2x20 (40DF), 1x4 (VampHS) |
| Missile Decoys: | 6 | none | unlimited | none |
| Devices: | N/A | Engine Power Core, Cloak, Sonar | Shield Battery, Flares, Cloak | Gun Power Core, Cloak, Deployable Turret |
| Jump Capable: | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
--Priest 05:05, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
Regarding pictures in table
I'm not so sure I like the pictures being in the table. Not every ship will automatically have different pictures available for different variants either. I think the look is cleaner with the pictures below the table as well. Plus, if we want to go for a standardized look for each fighter entry I'm not sure that this would be the way to go. --AD 05:06, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
- OK, was just a suggestion =)
- Though if we go for this standardized look for each fighter we could probably do something like an infobox I did for Straith on Tri-Sys-Com for each variant of a fighter... --Priest 05:21, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
I'm all for making the tables look better. I don't really know much about that kind of stuff myself. Maybe someone else thinks differently about the pictures but I feel at least that including them in the table is unnecessary. But as long as all the information remains in tact or is improved, by all means experiment with the actual look of the table. --AD 10:19, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
