Talk:Concordia-class fleet carrier

New article on the Concordia line. If anyone has more to add to its history or whatever else you can contribute, please feel free to do so. I will be updating this article as time goes on. Thank you.

-Aeronautico

You need to rework the last line. It's speculation and just doesn't fit well with the article. I only glanced over the rest but think you may also need to fix some more of it up as well.

- Dund

I agree. While the Midway class may have been developed as an economical replacement for the ageing fleet carriers, I doubt they would decomission the entire fleet of Concordias immediately.

The rest of the article seems okay, even if I don't like Americanisms, but that's just me. - Wedge009

The history might want to be rewritten a bit more though. I'm not sure how we should do these sometimes...do we include every single detail in a article like this or do we spread it out between individual ship articles? While I like the idea of having tons of info in one place, we have to organize it in a way that is useful to both us and anyone else wanting to buff up on WC history.

- Dund

What is the source of the 28,000 tonne mass figure? As far as I know, there was never a mass stated for the Concordia class. -dragon1

I did a quick bit of looking last night and could not find a source for it. So it should probably be removed. --Dundradal 14:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Done. - Wedge

---

Cut the following ships from the list, given their dubious status as Concordias and in some cases even as proper carriers:

• TCS Armageddon
• TCS Leyte Gulf
• TCS Liberty
• TCS Lincoln
• TCS Moskva (Destroyed)
• TCS Petrov
• TCS Saratoga
• TCS Verdun (Destroyed)
• TCS Viking
• TCS Viper (Destroyed)
• TCS Winterrowd (Destroyed)

- Bob 11:34, 21 August 2010 (CDT)