Category talk:Ships: Difference between revisions
The Terran Knowledge Bank
m (New page: A few more questions: What's the best way to categorize faction ships? right now we have Category:Kilrathi Ships and Category:Terran Confederation Ship... Shall both categori...) |
No edit summary |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
New Ships categorization implemented. Let me know what you think. | |||
I think we should definitely institute image maps for navigating the ship categories. I hate looking at just the text in the category listing. In subcategories this will also allow the use of the VDU images that Ships 2.0 utilize in their navigation screen. | |||
I think this will spruce up the rather bland look wiki can have. | |||
[[User: | |||
- Dund | |||
Update - We should do images of each factions symbol (if applicable) along with the fighter/ship that best represents the faction itself. So Confed and the Rapier II, Kilrathi and the Dralthi, Pirates and the Talon, UBW and the Banshee, etc. --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 14:31, 16 October 2011 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:31, 16 October 2011
New Ships categorization implemented. Let me know what you think.
I think we should definitely institute image maps for navigating the ship categories. I hate looking at just the text in the category listing. In subcategories this will also allow the use of the VDU images that Ships 2.0 utilize in their navigation screen.
I think this will spruce up the rather bland look wiki can have.
- Dund
Update - We should do images of each factions symbol (if applicable) along with the fighter/ship that best represents the faction itself. So Confed and the Rapier II, Kilrathi and the Dralthi, Pirates and the Talon, UBW and the Banshee, etc. --Dundradal 14:31, 16 October 2011 (CDT)
