Talk:William Eisen: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Aeronautico (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
As for Eisen being an admiral, I don't recall that bit of information. I'm pretty sure it's fan fiction. - Wedge | As for Eisen being an admiral, I don't recall that bit of information. I'm pretty sure it's fan fiction. - Wedge | ||
My apologies, Wedge. Well, it has been stated that ships 'like the Victory' were reactivated due to the carrier losses of the late 2660s, so yeah, the Victory might very well have been decommissioned during that time and then reactivated in the wake of the Battle of Earth.[[User:Aeronautico|Aeronautico]] 03:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:31, 8 May 2010
Was the Victory ever decommissioned? I don't seem to recall this particular event. (See first paragraph under 'Later Service'.) - Wedge
It was definitely decommissioned. The vessel is now a museum ship in WC4. It is no longer active on the front and does not fly under its own power.Aeronautico 19:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Question: I read somewhere in the past that Eisen eventually became an Admiral in his later career. I do not know if this is true, that may have been said by the fandom. Still, I wanted to verify this. Did he eventually become an Admiral?Aeronautico 19:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
No no no, I'm talking about the supposed decommissioning of the Victory between the early years of the Kilrathi War and her appearance in WC3. Read again: the first paragraph in the section labelled 'Later Years'.
As for Eisen being an admiral, I don't recall that bit of information. I'm pretty sure it's fan fiction. - Wedge
My apologies, Wedge. Well, it has been stated that ships 'like the Victory' were reactivated due to the carrier losses of the late 2660s, so yeah, the Victory might very well have been decommissioned during that time and then reactivated in the wake of the Battle of Earth.Aeronautico 03:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
