Category talk:Ships: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I started the project by doing the highest level of the category. I also categorized the [[Bhantkara-Class Carrier]] under the new system and started the second level of the Kilrathi category to show people what I wanted. | I started the project by doing the highest level of the category. I also categorized the [[Bhantkara-Class Carrier]] and [[Darket]] under the new system and started the second level of the Kilrathi category to show people what I wanted. | ||
Revision as of 05:36, 11 February 2010
Ship/fighter organization needs to be taken care of. It's very dispersed now. I realize the need to organize in multiple ways, but first we need to handle the basics then we can make further category breakdowns later on. We should have ships/fighters organized in these subcategories for each faction: Capital Ship Class Type (Carrier, Cruiser, etc), Capital Ship Class Name (Bengal-Class, Concordia-Class, etc), Individual Capital Ships (TCS Victory, TCS Concordia, etc), Fighter Type (Light, Medium, Heavy, Bomber), Fighter Name (F-27 Arrow, etc). This will make the category much clearer. Someone should take on this project of redoing all article and category pages. - Dund
So the main ships page should only show faction names: Confederation, Kilrathi, Pirate, Civilian, Retro, Union of Border Worlds, Nephilim, Steltek, CIS
In those subcategories would be: Capital Ships and Fighters
Under Capital Ships: Type, Class Name, Individual Ships Under Fighters: Type, Class Name
Under Capital Ship Type: Dreadnaught, Carrier, Cruiser, Destroyer, Corvette, Transport Under Fighter Type: Light, Medium, Heavy, Bomber
I started the project by doing the highest level of the category. I also categorized the Bhantkara-Class Carrier and Darket under the new system and started the second level of the Kilrathi category to show people what I wanted.
