Category talk:Ships: Difference between revisions
The Terran Knowledge Bank
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I think all Ships should be listed this way so its more orgainzed.--Blitz | I think all Ships should be listed this way so its more orgainzed.--Blitz | ||
:Looks like you're having a little bit of trouble with the categories, need any help?--[[User:Vinman|Vinman]] 05:02, 24 August 2007 (CDT) | :Looks like you're having a little bit of trouble with the categories, need any help with the formatting? Should the categories be Kilrathi Ships and Terran Ships?--[[User:Vinman|Vinman]] 05:02, 24 August 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:05, 24 August 2007
A few more questions:
What's the best way to categorize faction ships? right now we have Category:Kilrathi Ships and Category:Terran Confederation Ship...
Shall both categories be in plural? and have full name of the faction?
What do you think about it?
Priest 08:18, 19 August 2007 (CDT)
I've added a link under Category:Kilrathi fighters that links it to Category:Kilrathi Ships that way all K ships weather Fighters or Caps are listed together. I think all Ships should be listed this way so its more orgainzed.--Blitz
- Looks like you're having a little bit of trouble with the categories, need any help with the formatting? Should the categories be Kilrathi Ships and Terran Ships?--Vinman 05:02, 24 August 2007 (CDT)