User talk:Aeronautico: Difference between revisions
Aeronautico (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
KIS Sivar as in the SM1 ship I assume. I already did a basic Sivar-Class page however it is missing stuff from the movie to a degree. Make sure you check every source for that ship as some of the information is spread around. | KIS Sivar as in the SM1 ship I assume. I already did a basic Sivar-Class page however it is missing stuff from the movie to a degree. Make sure you check every source for that ship as some of the information is spread around. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 14: | ||
- Aeronautico | - Aeronautico | ||
The old CIC encyclopedia is a source to use sparingly. It contains some errors and lacks a lot of information generally. It is best if you only work on articles that you have the sources for. So that you can fill in the blanks that are in many of the old encyclopedia entries. | |||
I told you to only clean up your previous articles before moving on, otherwise you are just leaving them for me or someone else to clean up. Something I don't want to have to do. If you have a question about an article...ask it at the forums...you've got hundreds of WC experts willing to help. | |||
Lastly, don't worry about creating a superweapons category. That is something we will discuss at the IRC meeting when the time comes. No need to continue to divest focus by jumping all over the place. For now again, FOCUS ON CLEANING UP YOUR ARTICLES. After that's done we can talk about where you can focus. As it stands now I'm the only one working on WC1 (mission entries) and I should be done most of them in a week or two. | |||
- Dundradal | |||
Revision as of 01:44, 21 March 2009
KIS Sivar as in the SM1 ship I assume. I already did a basic Sivar-Class page however it is missing stuff from the movie to a degree. Make sure you check every source for that ship as some of the information is spread around.
What about your other articles that need cleaning up? You should handle those first before moving off to something else.
- Dundradal
Well, that would help me to focus a bit on areas where I can truly be useful. It is a little overwhelming to consider where I can contribute when most efforts are on WC1. Okay, I'll focus on fixing my current articles for the time being.
One more thing I would like to confirm: Is the CIC Encyclopedia a legitimate source here? That's where most of my info comes from. Most of my articles are composed of information gathered and reworked from related articles referring to related topics. This is something I need to know, because now I doubt my own works myself.
- Aeronautico
ONE more question, and then I'll shut up: Shall we create a category for superweapons, for things like the Temblor Bomb, Gravition Gun, Proton Accelerator Gun, Mace Nuke, etc.? These weapons don't seem to fit into the existing Missile category or weapons list, which focuses on lasers. Just a suggestion.
- Aeronautico
The old CIC encyclopedia is a source to use sparingly. It contains some errors and lacks a lot of information generally. It is best if you only work on articles that you have the sources for. So that you can fill in the blanks that are in many of the old encyclopedia entries.
I told you to only clean up your previous articles before moving on, otherwise you are just leaving them for me or someone else to clean up. Something I don't want to have to do. If you have a question about an article...ask it at the forums...you've got hundreds of WC experts willing to help.
Lastly, don't worry about creating a superweapons category. That is something we will discuss at the IRC meeting when the time comes. No need to continue to divest focus by jumping all over the place. For now again, FOCUS ON CLEANING UP YOUR ARTICLES. After that's done we can talk about where you can focus. As it stands now I'm the only one working on WC1 (mission entries) and I should be done most of them in a week or two.
- Dundradal
