Talk:Concordia-class fleet carrier: Difference between revisions

The Terran Knowledge Bank
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:


- Dund
- Dund
I agree. While the Midway class may have been developed as an economical replacement for the ageing fleet carriers, I doubt they would decomission the entire fleet of Concordias immediately.
The rest of the article seems okay, even if I don't like Americanisms, but that's just me. - Wedge009
The history might want to be rewritten a bit more though. I'm not sure how we should do these sometimes...do we include every single detail in a article like this or do we spread it out between individual ship articles? While I like the idea of having tons of info in one place, we have to organize it in a way that is useful to both us and anyone else wanting to buff up on WC history.
- Dund
What is the source of the 28,000 tonne mass figure? As far as I know, there was never a mass stated for the Concordia class.
-dragon1
I did a quick bit of looking last night and could not find a source for it. So it should probably be removed.
--[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 14:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Done. - Wedge
----
Cut the following ships from the list, given their dubious status as ''Concordia''s and in some cases even as proper carriers:
*''TCS Armageddon''
*''TCS Leyte Gulf''
*''TCS Liberty''
*''TCS Lincoln''
*''TCS Moskva'' (Destroyed)
*''TCS Petrov''
*''TCS Saratoga''
*''TCS Verdun'' (Destroyed)
*''TCS Viking''
*''TCS Viper'' (Destroyed)
*''TCS Winterrowd'' (Destroyed)
- [[User:Bob McDob|Bob]] 11:34, 21 August 2010 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 01:24, 9 September 2012

New article on the Concordia line. If anyone has more to add to its history or whatever else you can contribute, please feel free to do so. I will be updating this article as time goes on. Thank you.

-Aeronautico


You need to rework the last line. It's speculation and just doesn't fit well with the article. I only glanced over the rest but think you may also need to fix some more of it up as well.

- Dund

I agree. While the Midway class may have been developed as an economical replacement for the ageing fleet carriers, I doubt they would decomission the entire fleet of Concordias immediately.

The rest of the article seems okay, even if I don't like Americanisms, but that's just me. - Wedge009

The history might want to be rewritten a bit more though. I'm not sure how we should do these sometimes...do we include every single detail in a article like this or do we spread it out between individual ship articles? While I like the idea of having tons of info in one place, we have to organize it in a way that is useful to both us and anyone else wanting to buff up on WC history.

- Dund

What is the source of the 28,000 tonne mass figure? As far as I know, there was never a mass stated for the Concordia class. -dragon1

I did a quick bit of looking last night and could not find a source for it. So it should probably be removed. --Dundradal 14:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Done. - Wedge



Cut the following ships from the list, given their dubious status as Concordias and in some cases even as proper carriers:

  • TCS Armageddon
  • TCS Leyte Gulf
  • TCS Liberty
  • TCS Lincoln
  • TCS Moskva (Destroyed)
  • TCS Petrov
  • TCS Saratoga
  • TCS Verdun (Destroyed)
  • TCS Viking
  • TCS Viper (Destroyed)
  • TCS Winterrowd (Destroyed)

- Bob 11:34, 21 August 2010 (CDT)