User talk:Iceblade: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Aside from the Sheridan marine craft and more thorough entries for the Wildcat and Hurricane regarding their involvement in McAuliffe, I have posted all of the craft introduced in Action Stations with as best of descriptions that I could come up with, which aren't that great really. - Iceblade 27 April 2012 | Aside from the Sheridan marine craft and more thorough entries for the Wildcat and Hurricane regarding their involvement in McAuliffe, I have posted all of the craft introduced in Action Stations with as best of descriptions that I could come up with, which aren't that great really. - Iceblade 27 April 2012 | ||
That's great! Something is better than nothing! You should try to swing by #wingnut tomorrow. I'll be around and we can talk shop. I'd like help trying to finalize a layout for the other Ships. We've come up with some ideas to try. --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 22:59, 28 April 2012 (CDT) | |||
Yeah, that's what I was thinking of! Something like that would be good to add to your template. Maybe after the stats tables and stuff. Maybe make it collapsible. Come by #wingnut tonight, I don't have to teach tonight so I'll be there and we can keep working on this. Great stuff! --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 07:28, 1 May 2012 (CDT) | |||
What's with all the redirects of categories to pages and then putting the page in the category? There isn't a need to categorize redirects (and some of them aren't necessary...you can just use the [blah blah|Category:Blah blah] tags. I noticed several infinite redirects (LaFong, the novels) you should undo those. They just create loops. --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 15:04, 3 May 2012 (CDT) | |||
:That was unintentional. I'm not that familiar with all of the little syntactic quirks here yet. Added the colon necessary to prevent the loop. | |||
I liked the conversations as they were on the Hornet article. They look weird now when you expand them now. There is also nothing telling the user that they are expand/hide tags. I was thinking more along the lines of making the whole section collapsible and not each part depending on how long the make the article. We may not need to use it at all and just let the whole thing hang out. We can talk about it tonight, but I think the old format is better. --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 07:23, 4 May 2012 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
Hey! I'm back from my trip and wanted to check in with you to see how things were going on the Ship pages. My summer teaching schedule is pretty light, so I should be able to help out. Drop by #wingnut whenever! And keep up the good work! --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 16:31, 17 May 2012 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:31, 17 May 2012
Welcome to Wing Commander Encyclopedia! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! Dundradal 02:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Aside from the Sheridan marine craft and more thorough entries for the Wildcat and Hurricane regarding their involvement in McAuliffe, I have posted all of the craft introduced in Action Stations with as best of descriptions that I could come up with, which aren't that great really. - Iceblade 27 April 2012
That's great! Something is better than nothing! You should try to swing by #wingnut tomorrow. I'll be around and we can talk shop. I'd like help trying to finalize a layout for the other Ships. We've come up with some ideas to try. --Dundradal 22:59, 28 April 2012 (CDT)
Yeah, that's what I was thinking of! Something like that would be good to add to your template. Maybe after the stats tables and stuff. Maybe make it collapsible. Come by #wingnut tonight, I don't have to teach tonight so I'll be there and we can keep working on this. Great stuff! --Dundradal 07:28, 1 May 2012 (CDT)
What's with all the redirects of categories to pages and then putting the page in the category? There isn't a need to categorize redirects (and some of them aren't necessary...you can just use the [blah blah|Category:Blah blah] tags. I noticed several infinite redirects (LaFong, the novels) you should undo those. They just create loops. --Dundradal 15:04, 3 May 2012 (CDT)
- That was unintentional. I'm not that familiar with all of the little syntactic quirks here yet. Added the colon necessary to prevent the loop.
I liked the conversations as they were on the Hornet article. They look weird now when you expand them now. There is also nothing telling the user that they are expand/hide tags. I was thinking more along the lines of making the whole section collapsible and not each part depending on how long the make the article. We may not need to use it at all and just let the whole thing hang out. We can talk about it tonight, but I think the old format is better. --Dundradal 07:23, 4 May 2012 (CDT)
Hey! I'm back from my trip and wanted to check in with you to see how things were going on the Ship pages. My summer teaching schedule is pretty light, so I should be able to help out. Drop by #wingnut whenever! And keep up the good work! --Dundradal 16:31, 17 May 2012 (CDT)
