Talk:Proton Accelerator Gun: Difference between revisions
The Terran Knowledge Bank
(New page: Where is it stated that Terrans called the Phase-Transit Cannon a Proton Accelerator Gun? My understanding is that the Proton Accelerator Gun and Graviton Weapon are interchangeable terms ...) |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Where is it stated that Terrans called the Phase-Transit Cannon a Proton Accelerator Gun? My understanding is that the Proton Accelerator Gun and Graviton Weapon are interchangeable terms for the weapon of the Sivar, while the Phase-Transit Cannon was the version used on the Confederation dreadnoughts. - Wedge | Where is it stated that Terrans called the Phase-Transit Cannon a Proton Accelerator Gun? My understanding is that the Proton Accelerator Gun and Graviton Weapon are interchangeable terms for the weapon of the Sivar, while the Phase-Transit Cannon was the version used on the Confederation dreadnoughts. - Wedge | ||
[http://crius.net/zone/showpost.php?p=199335] | |||
[http://crius.net/zone/showpost.php?p=339415] | |||
[http://crius.net/zone/showpost.php?p=345831] | |||
I'm going to modify the article based on the information from these posts (and the last point in [[Talk:TCS_Concordia_%28CVS-65%29]] as well). - Wedge | |||
No idea, but I'm guessing this is stuff pulled from the old encyc that is just being copy and pasted here so it's full of errors. --[[User:Dundradal|Dundradal]] 12:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Didn't notice anything from there, but it's okay, it's all fixed now. - Wedge | |||
Latest revision as of 13:14, 4 August 2010
Where is it stated that Terrans called the Phase-Transit Cannon a Proton Accelerator Gun? My understanding is that the Proton Accelerator Gun and Graviton Weapon are interchangeable terms for the weapon of the Sivar, while the Phase-Transit Cannon was the version used on the Confederation dreadnoughts. - Wedge
I'm going to modify the article based on the information from these posts (and the last point in Talk:TCS_Concordia_(CVS-65) as well). - Wedge
No idea, but I'm guessing this is stuff pulled from the old encyc that is just being copy and pasted here so it's full of errors. --Dundradal 12:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Didn't notice anything from there, but it's okay, it's all fixed now. - Wedge
