H hellcatv SwabbieBanned Mar 11, 2005 #4 because that's probably FLT_MIN the smallest positive number ;-) We could make the display code smarter...or you could just get used to reading scientific notation ;-)
because that's probably FLT_MIN the smallest positive number ;-) We could make the display code smarter...or you could just get used to reading scientific notation ;-)
B blindcoder Spaceman Mar 11, 2005 #5 I escaped having to study for not having to read those stuff Well, simply casting the value to int before displaying it should probably be all that's necessary for this, no?
I escaped having to study for not having to read those stuff Well, simply casting the value to int before displaying it should probably be all that's necessary for this, no?
H hellcatv SwabbieBanned Mar 11, 2005 #6 true that could work ;-) of course at the time the code was written the relationship could be infinitely high or low--now that's not the case
true that could work ;-) of course at the time the code was written the relationship could be infinitely high or low--now that's not the case